ComBlu specializes in community marketing and influencer programs. Our Lumenatti blog sparks conversation about the best and brightest community ideas.

Home → Blogs → Lumenatti
  • 08.18.2009

    The Tower of Babble

    There is a story about the Tower of Babel in which a great tower was built in the city of Babylon thousands of years ago. 

    Babylon was a cosmopolitan city, many of the citizens were very impressed with themselves.  They were very important.  They did important things.  What they did, what they said eclipsed the value of everything and everybody else. 

    Across this city/state there were a myriad of languages spoken, roll all of this together and it was a very confusing and problematic place to be at the time. 

    All of this self impression along with the conflicting languages caused things to go badly.

    Hmmm.  Does any of this strike a cord?  Did you notice in my blog posting I deliberately mis-spelled Babel?  It’s typed as ‘Babble’.  Dictionary.com defines Babble as “to talk idly, irrationally, excessively, or foolishly; chatter or prattle.” 

    Sound vaguely familiar yet?  No?  Ok, I’ll keep going.

    How about this.  Earned Media.  Getting warmer?  Tagging? Uh-huh.  Uniques?  Yep.  Web 2.0?  Sure.  Tweets.  Of course.  What about this one:  Link Juice.  Ummmm.

    Marketers have their own language that to others sounds like well, babble.  Try an experiment.  Set a meeting request to your company’s CFO and put in the subject line ‘Briefing on Earned Media, Tagging and Link Juice. 

    See if he or she accepts or instead, declines and emails you back asking what the @#!&# it is you want to waste their time with. 

    Respond saying you made a mistake.  You want to share a few cost-deflection and lost revenue earn-back strategies you’d come across.  You’ll probably get a different result.  You see, marketers speak ‘promotion’, while CFO’s speak P&L (profit and loss).  Accountants speak GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principals), VP’s of Manufacturing speak Lean or Cellular (as in Lean or Cellular Manufacturing).  A few mutants still speak Six Sigma.  Together at some level in the organization, the management committee made up of the C-level and EVP level peeps who make decisions like merge, divest, close the Scranton Office, etc. speak Revenue Center and Cost Center. 

    Revenue and Cost center is an interesting language, it has two intertwined dialects.  The first, ‘Cost’ is brutal and gutteral, sort of like Gaelic.  ‘Revenue’, on the other hand is more melodious and sweet; a joy to listen to

    Those who speak Revenue and Cost see things as, well…generating either revenue or incurring cost.  Revenue and Cost speaks only of black and whites. You as a marketer are part of that world.  Yes!  It’s true.  Unfortunately, you reside more often than not in the Cost side; not always a comfortable place.  Sales sits in the Revenue side, which can be much more fun.  The reason is metrics.  Sales can show direct contribution to revenue.  TV ads and guerilla marketing tactics usually don’t.  Sales are easy to defend.  Without hard metrics, marketing is well, squishy and couple squishy metrics with terms and definitions that others don’t get and you are on thin ice in terms of value and influence.

    While the term Earned Media sounds cool and is important to help describe all of which help define the granular inner-workings of some marketing tactic, its impact or outcome, most people outside of the marketing department don’t care or even understand.  Your marketing power points cause some in the organization to spontaneously bleed from the ears (note:  this will usually cause them to exclude you from critical meetings like budget planning).

    Not being understood is bad.  If they don’t understand, you’re value to the organization is diminished (imagine getting a new boss who doesn’t understand what you do.  How long will you last?). 

    dilbert

    If those who speak Revenue and Cost can’t understand your department or your program’s value, you don’t get the opportunity to actively shape how the marketing promise is delivered. 

    Those who control the business enterprise (the making of the widget, the pricing of the widget and the distribution of said widget make their decisions regarding the widget without you.  Your input falls on deaf ears.  Yikes!  Hell on earth!

    So what to do?  Don’t live in the chaos of Babylon waiting for the impending doom.  Be proactive!  Learn a second language and communicate.  When we as marketers are as versatile in the other operational languages our peers speak as we are in our own language, amazing things will happen.  One:  You will start measuring your activity and results in ways that are important to others (those who speak Revenue and Cost).  Two:  Your influence and work will amplify in terms of results.  Marketing initiatives will begin to be baked into operational activities and visa versa.

    What were previously siloed activities will begin to work more harmoniously (i.e. CRM and Social Marketing) and you as a marketer will cease to be viewed by the other non-marketers in the company (whom by the way out number you) as not just the creator of hokey messaging and some un-measurable brand promise but instead the gate keeper of customer loyalty, net profit generation, low-cost win-backs and heck, maybe even a cost deflection source!

    Well, we are at the end of this blog posting and the four non-marketers who were reading this have already gotten their fill and left, so I will reveal the big important ah-ha.  One that trumps even decoding Revenue and Cost.

    You as marketers will hold the power of the customer in your hands and strong customer demand trumps everything.  You will understand them better than anyone, you will know how to reach and keep them happy.  You will know how to convert more customers using targeted, efficient techniques and tools.  You will balance the promise of your marketing efforts with the delivery of those promises by the operation.  You will be the master of customer engagement efficiency!  You will drive profit, which you can measure and defend…and that is a very good place to be.

    That is, if you like that kind of stuff.

  • 05.27.2009

    Making the leap from product utility to customer experience

    I recently attended the latest WOMMA conference in Miami. It was an intense two days, full of knowledge transfer during various break out sessions. We explored the trends and insights of customer engagement, through community and social media. We also listened to similar stories of what was finally proving to be successful, in our ever-evolving world. But, many of these case studies were around causes that ComBlu has always pioneered. For the brands in attendance however, the information was new, exciting and even a little scary.

    Brands were in the same boat, asking similar questions such as:

    How do I sell this internally?

    How do I monetize this?

    How do I even begin!?

    During a breakout session I noticed one individual was just scratching his head, looking sad of all things. I asked him what was wrong. He said, “Great. I get it. We should be doing this. ALL of this.”

    Am I missing something here?

    “Well, we do insurance. Who wants to talk about insurance?” he asked with dismay.

    I started to think. Well, lots of people! My brain working quickly, I began to lay out an idea.

    What’s important in people’s lives? What do we talk about? Family, safety, security, assets, natural disasters, buying one’s first home. I could go on. If your product is boring or un-sexy, go beyond the utility of it and create an experience. Jump right in. Be THE place for these conversations that your customers, or potential customers, are having.

    Riffing off this idea, another agency representative said, “Exactly. And, you can provide a place for questions and resources. Insurance is confusing.”

    He began to brighten, because now we’ve got something. I continued on.

    An insurance community can be a portal for life. With a community you can stimulate everyday conversation, and become relevant to people’s lives. Give guidance, and be a comfort in times of disaster, trouble and need. Be a resource, and provide the content your customers are looking for. Listen, and get direct customer feedback that could help your process and increase satisfaction. Look at it as an opportunity, and not a problem. I could almost see the gears begin to turn in his head.

    Do all of this right and you can even measure its effectiveness. You’d be amazed at what a little brand loyalty and awareness will get you. It struck me then, that for an insurer, a little customer love may just be the holy grail.

    To drive it home, I began to talk about cost deflection. Eventually your members will develop their own expertise around your service offerings and processes. If engaged properly, they will begin to help each other with policy questions and other important decisions. You’ll save money in a number of areas: claims administration, customer service and support for starters.

    Full on smile now. He got up in a daze, reached for his cell phone and walked away. I looked for him later, but never saw him again. Oh well, I hope I was of some help. Good luck Insurance Man.

  • 05.20.2009

    Community 2.0: Getting on the same page

    I recently attended the Community 2.0 conference in San Francisco.  I am going to try and distill my experience down into a couple of key thoughts about what I learned.

    1.  Brands have begun to understand the importance that their operation (i.e. the other elements of the business that deliver against the promise they tee up).  Granted, I think they knew these other areas were important, it is just that for the first time, operational aspects of the business can participate in brand building…using community and also social media tools.

    Community infrastructure allows for dialogue and learning to occur between the parties involved.  It’s two way.  Everybody gives and takes.  Community.

    Social media tools allows for a broader reach of a brand message at a lower cost than traditional mar-com tools.  Oh, if done right, they are also more measurable.

    Marketers seem excited…and a bit concerned with the challenge of ‘operationalizing’ of social media and community efforts.  Why?  Their job just got more complex and more important all at the same time.

    2.  Agencies still want to cram everything into the shiny penny they are selling.  Forget whether it belongs or not.

    Plus, based on the tweets I saw during the presentation on risk planning that Drew Bartkiewicz gave, most agency attendees feared they would start bleeding from their ears due to the ‘blandness’ of his topic.  Another attendee from the brand side commented, half joking, he may as well been presenting the value proposition of patent law….those that ‘got it’ understood its importance and paid attention but this importance was lost on a big section of the participants-mostly because it wasn’t sexy.  In my opinion, it was their loss; the people who paid attention were smarter for it.

    In the end, there were a number of terrific presenters and marketers attending that are asking smart questions.  Some great lessons learned but we still are not addressing the big issues.  Such as:

    • What’s the overarching strategy for either social media or community…or both?
    • How do these efforts deliver business value across the organization specifically?  What is the ‘ratio’ of activities which get applied to categories such as Advocacy, Feedback and Support and what’s the value we attribute to each of these categories, as well as, the ratio?
    • How does the organization (beyond the marketing department) play a role on an ongoing basis?  How is this defined and managed?
    • What are the real and hard metrics which prove value and sustainability?  How are these metrics aggregated across the organization, absorbed and acted upon?

     

    Interestingly, and not by my design, these questions and topics marketers were focusing their questions mapped to the slides I included in my last blog post, ‘Community by the Numbers’.  I shared the draft of that blog posting to a number of people and was urged to publish the first installment during Community 2.0, which I did.

    Granted, these are hard topics to tackle.  However, nothing worthwhile is easy.

  • 05.13.2009

    Community by the numbers part one

    Where performance is measured, performance improves. Where performance is measured and reported, the rate of improvement accelerates.

    -Thomas S. Monson (1927 -  )

    If you can’t measure something, is it worthwhile? 

    What would the NCAA Final Four be if they didn’t keep score (heck, would there even be a Final Four?!)

    Would you ever diet if you never weighed yourself and only wore clothes with elastic waist bands?

    Does performance matter if no one cares?

    Performance is important.  But what is it?  Performance is benchmarking (having something to compare progress against), a method to actually measure or track changes and a desired outcome.  Pretty simple actually.

    Think about performance in business terms.  As a customer of some brand, if you have a problem and call their help line, are disconnected twice, on hold for 20 minutes and find out when you reach someone they can’t help you, how do you measure that brand’s performance?  Is this brand experience worth it?

    As an employee, what if you were 3 years behind on the development of a new product and didn’t track against any budgets?  What if you didn’t track pricing or quality? How would your company’s performance be measured?  Would you be competitive?  How would you know?

    Lots of brands have communities.  Some are better developed than others, but how are these communities performing?  Does it matter?  And to whom?

    Well, it does matter.  It should matter to a lot of people…people both directly and indirectly involved in that brands community.  Community can have a HUGE impact on a brand and its underlying operational components by driving results in three categories:

    1.  Advocacy (both WOM and product/service consumption)

    2.  Feedback 

    3.  Support 

    The problem is that some businesses don’t seem to understand the importance of community. They treat it like….an after thought.  Outside of three people in the marketing department, community is something that isn’t even on the radar screen. Is community as important as a patent? How about a state of the art distribution center?

    For most businesses, who some operational experts call ‘laggards’, community is only viewed as another channel to push branded messaging. Other businesses, which operational experts call ‘innovators’, community is part and parcel to everything they do.

    Below are two models. Which one looks like your company? Depending on how you answer (be honest), community is either a ‘thing’…marketing function and provides you limited value but one you can draw a nice neat box around.

    1

    Or instead, community in some form or fashion permeates every aspect of your business. You can’t easily define where it starts and where it stops. It just is. It’s organized and it’s everywhere.

    2

    If you say, “hey, this sort of looks like what we do”, you work for a leader. An innovator. It doesn’t matter whether you do it perfectly or not (nobody does), your business is a high performer.

    The bad news is there are lots of laggards and worse, most of them don’t want to change.  The good news is innovators want to get better and some laggards just need a roadmap and some encouragement. 

    So my question in this installment (one of three) is where does community reside in your organization? Are you an innovator or a laggard? In either case do you want to improve your organization’s performance?  Community is a strategic asset if deployed properly. 

    In part two of this installment I’ll focus on how to measure community and then what to do with the numbers.

  • 05.08.2009

    Do you know your customers as well as they know you?

    I had a conversation recently that brought up this interesting question. Since I can’t stop thinking about it, here we go.

    Brands continue to take the plunge into the ocean of transparency and consumer advocacy. Turning over the keys and employing user or consumer generated content into a marketing strategy is risky, but, if done correctly, the ROI is huge. This is not news. We already know this, and the reason is simple. Your customers know you. In fact, they know you better than you know yourself. Remember, perception is reality.

    Not only do your customers know you, the ones that know you inside and out, have the most influence. Advocate influence directly affects your bottom line–for better or for worse. Advocates make up a critical, but very small segment of your customer base. Size doesn’t matter, because it is their personal experiences with your brand that counts.

    Do you have the right set of tools to find your advocates? Ask yourself a couple of questions. Do you know how to identify the right advocate behaviors and traits in the first place? Can you put together a profile that goes beyond database marketing?

    Or, are you so focused on the importance of the right demographic and transactional data, that 20-somethings and moms with active lifestyles fit your ideal? Can you apply a loyalty multiplier to understand the dollar value beyond the purchase?

    Advocate identification is both an art and a science. Implement a strong methodology behind your customer profiling. Tap into the smallest percentage of your customer base that has the largest reach. Advocates are hard-wired to talk about you. Take a step further and engage with them. Those conversations will be positive and effective.

    Empowering your advocates that know you best and letting them speak for you is a smart strategy, but you have to know who they are first.

    Do you?

  • 03.10.2009

    Fuzzy Math

    This is going to be a short and sweet blog post, so relax.  You’ll get through it in 30 seconds.

    Today Brand Week posted an article titled ‘45% of CMO’s See Agencies as a Time Suck’.  Okay.  Two sides to every story.  Although I don’t see it as my job to defend ad agencies, sometimes clients don’t always give clear direction.  People are overworked, understaffed and the data available to work with isn’t always the best. 

    That said, the article goes onto state that only 21% believe they are getting the best work the agency is capable of.  Wow.  That reminds me of the Congress approval rating.

    Worse yet, Jupiter (study publisher) states that a whopping 89% of CMO’s are under greater scrutiny to show…and prove results.  Eighty nine percent.  Couple this with the fact that only fifty percent of marketers and agencies say that delivering ROI is their number one priority.

    Let me repeat this.  Eighty nine percent of CMO’s are under pressure by THIER bosses to demonstrate hard, measurable results.  Only 50% of agencies make this a priority.  Twenty one percent of CMO’s think they are getting value for their dollar. 

    As my friend Jonathan Salem Baskin (Dim Bulb Blog) said to me in an email,

    umm...50% of marketers see their #1 purpose as delivering ROI?  what the hell are the other half doing?  this is frightening stuff...

    Results matter.  I get the fact that creative is difficult to quantify.  However, strategies and tactics can be measured and everything should have a business result.  If it doesn’t, what’s the point?  Last time I checked, most brands didn’t set out to be (or today, want to be) not-for-profits.

    As a CMO friend of mine remarked to me, “When I walk into the board room to present my results, I face a bunch of people who care about only one thing.  Results.  Hard, measurable results.  Full stop.  What delivers and can prove the right results is part of the solution.  What doesn’t is part of the problem.  Period. End of discussion.”

    Something worth keeping in mind.

  • 02.27.2009

    Should social media rewrite business rules?

    There is an interesting question.  First, you have to put a definition on what social media is.

    This might seem like a silly thing to do for some, but I imagine if you ask the CFO of any business (big or small) what their definition of Social Media is, you’ll get a funny look like, “Huh?  What?  Why are you wasting my time with that kind of question?  I have all this red ink and you want to talk about what?”

    So here it goes.  Social Media, defined in part within Wikipedia:

    “Primarily, social media depend on interactions between people as the discussion and integration of words to build shared-meaning, using technology as a conduit.

    Social media utilities create opportunities for the use of both inductive and deductive logic by their users. Claims or warrants are quickly transitioned into generalizations due to the manner in which shared statements are posted and viewed by all. The speed of communication, breadth, and depth, and ability to see how the words build a case solicits the use of rhetoric. Induction is frequently used as a means to validate or authenticate different users' statements and words. Rhetoric is an important part of today’s language in social media.”

    Hmmm.  Sounds like a text book entry (under GAAP Principals), so let me translate.

    “People sharing insight, ideas, know how and content with one another using a variety of content mediums that reside on the Internet.”

    There.  Social Media in a nutshell.

    Why is the reality of social media activity important and why should our fictional CFO care?  For that matter, why should anyone else care besides the marketer? 

    Why?  Because social media and the knowledge that can come out of it provides the business a significant strategic advantage.  So who else should care and why?

    Well, here are a few, other than our CFO and the CMO/marketing team of course.

    1.  CEO.  Social media activity is an accurate barometer of brand equity and corporate reputation.  What social media is comprised of (i.e. what’s inside of UGC) is telling as to the company’s current profitability and future performance.  How hard does the company need to work to maintain market share?  Lots goes into this analysis but social media provides a very real comparable metric to help measure whether the company’s internal metrics are accurate and why.  Being able for the CEO to provide real insight at a shareholder meeting or an analyst conference call is important.  It’s doubtful the CEO will reference his source as a social media output, but that’s not the point here.  Social media’s underlying value is.

    2. COO.  Why?  Social media activity both internally and externally can indicate well the business and its resources are aligned within the marketplace to deliver on projections, plans and results.  Social media metrics can be compared with operational plans to see if the plans were realistic in the first place, on target or slightly off.  Social media tools and metrics can offer operators ‘real time’ adjustment indices if used properly.

    3.  EVP of HR.  Social media isn’t limited to external venues.  How engaged is your brand and your team.  How collaborative are they (or are they capable of being based on the infrastructures and culture in which they operate)?  There are some big brands that are absolutely committed to this.  One old-line brand, a leading insurance provider even makes this a metric that is presented to the board of directors along with things like net profit.

    4.  EVP of Sales.  Sales has a lot it can learn from social media.  Value proposition is best delivered from the mouths of customers themselves, as the sales department always has a primary goal-close the transaction.

    5.  VP of CRM.  Once the sale is closed, who owns the customer?  Most likely the CRM team does.  They get measured on support costs, call duration in-bound requests, churn and a whole lot of other customer-stickiness metrics.  Social media helps to deflect a lot of these costs, as well as, understand what’s driving inbound requests and churn.  Microsoft gets this.

    5.  EVP or VP or Product Development.  Necessity is the mother of invention.  If you want something to work a certain way, you create a work around.  Sometimes, understanding what those work arounds are helps teams innovate.  Sometimes, it’s just asking for ideas.  www.ideastorm.com is the obvious example.  There are dozens of others…good and bad (i.e. that work and don’t work).  Intuit works.  MyStarbucksidea.com doesn’t.

    7.  Institutional and individual investors.  Another  part of doing good homework.  What are customers saying and how well is the brand listening?  There is an old-line manufacturing truism.  To understand how well run a manufacturing company is, simply look at it’s loading dock.  A neat and orderly loading dock says the business is on top of things.  Broken pallets, trash and disarray speaks volumes,  You’d be surprised how many savvy investors who bet (or did before the meltdown) on manufacturers did this kind of homework.  Social media can provide the same sort of insight if approached correctly.

    Here’s a proof point.  This factoid was provided by my friend and colleague Barak Libai, professor at Tel Aviv University and Advisor to WOMMA and is taken from a good book by Gupta and Lehmann on "Managing Customers as Investments"  and relates to Cox Communications.

    Untitled

    You can see that the defection rate for customers who use the product in a wider way is much lower. Much of this wider use comes from formal and informal social media activities (people helping, showing and spreading the word.  This can translate to double the lifetime value!  

    Double…that’s a lot of coin, my friend.

    Can social media rewrite business rules?  I am here to tell you that that it already is.  So where are you?  Ahead of the curve or behind it?